Falsification №20 of the Big Bang Theory: Intergalactic Distance Unchanged Over Time
Galaxies are supposed to be receding from each other: They are not.
Thanks to Douglas Giles for his wonderful essay entitled:
What if the Universe Is NOT Expanding?
Dr. Giles is a philosophy professor who obviously understands the absurdity of the current cosmogony. Normally, anyone teaching philosophy in the US has to present both sides of controversial issues, generally confusing students with a mishmash of religion and science. Not so, apparently, for Dr. Giles, who’s most recent book has this intriguing title: “How We Are and How We Got Here: A Practical History of Western Philosophy.”
Intergalactic distances have been measured during the last two decades by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, among others. None have found evidence for universal expansion, which is a primary foundation of the Big Bang Theory. In spite of that, Wikipedia parrots the party line by proclaiming “All these results are in agreement with the measurements of other experiments, notably those of WMAP. They confirm the standard cosmological model.” The standard model is, of course, the Big Bang Theory.
Here is the gist of Dr. Giles’s Medium essay in which he gets it right:
“The observations of galaxies show that when we plot every observed galaxy by its distance from us we get an even distribution. If we compare an incredibly huge section of space centered on a point 2 billion light years away with a same incredibly huge section 8 billion light years away, we see roughly the same density of galaxies 2 billion lights years distant from us as 2, 3, 4, and so on billion light years distant.”
